The Local Radio Freedom Act is getting more and more support from members of the House. Now, a  companion resolution has been introduced into the Senate to curb any royalties needed to be paid in order to play music on air.

It seems these have been introduced in opposition to the American Music Fairness Act. This was introduced in January. Its aim is to “establish a performance right for sound recordings broadcasted by terrestrial radio.” This is great for the artists. They’ve been receiving royalties on digital and streaming platforms, however, radio is the only area artists have not been compensated.

There are stipulations: small local radio broadcasters would receive an exemption for stations with less than $1.5 million in annual revenue. There are still fees attached, it’s not known how much those fees would be. With radio struggling in the budget area…this could be a heavy blow to local stations across the country.

The Local Radio Freedom Act was introduced by Senator John Barrasso and Senator Maggie Hassan, along with 18 co-sponsors. Its aim is to “oppose any new performance fee, tax, royalty or other charge” on stations. Barrasso has brought up the fact in his home state of Wyoming they use local radio for pertinent information. In other articles, we’ve outlined the necessity of local radio when disaster strikes. The fees to pay for music would imminently hit these smaller stations, possibly causing them to shut down.

As of today, 129 House members are onboard with the Local Radio Freedom Act. That number is expected to only rise. Broadcasters are expected to meet with local representatives during the NAB’s State Leadership Conference. President Donald Trump is expected on Capitol Hill this week and could address both the Local Radio Freedom Act as well as the American Music Fairness Act.

Find out more about the Local Radio Freedom Act HERE

Find out more about the American Music Fairness Act HERE